UUID vs Auto-Increment: Which Should You Use?
When designing a database schema, one of the most important decisions is choosing the right primary key strategy. The two most popular options are traditional auto-increment integers and UUIDs (Universally Unique Identifiers). Each has its strengths and weaknesses.
Auto-Increment IDs: The Traditional Approach
Auto-increment IDs have been the go-to choice for decades. They're simple, sequential, and storage-efficient. A 32-bit integer takes only 4 bytes, while a 64-bit BIGINT uses 8 bytes. They're also human-readable, making debugging easier.
Pros
- Small storage footprint (4-8 bytes)
- Sequential for optimal B-tree indexing
- Easy to read and debug
- Native support in all databases
Cons
- Reveals information about record count
- Can cause conflicts in distributed systems
- Requires database round-trip for new IDs
- Not suitable for merging databases
UUIDs: The Modern Solution
UUIDs are 128-bit identifiers that can be generated anywhere without coordination. They're perfect for distributed systems, microservices, and applications that need to generate IDs before database insertion.
Pros
- Can be generated anywhere, anytime
- No conflicts in distributed systems
- Secure - no information leakage
- Perfect for microservices and APIs
Cons
- Larger storage (16 bytes)
- Random UUIDs cause index fragmentation
- Not human-readable
- Slightly slower inserts with random UUIDs
The Best of Both Worlds: UUID v7
UUID v7 is a game-changer. It combines a Unix timestamp prefix with random data, giving you sortable, time-ordered UUIDs that perform nearly as well as auto-increment for database indexing while maintaining all the benefits of UUIDs.
Conclusion
For new projects in 2024 and beyond, UUID v7 is often the best choice. It offers the distributed generation benefits of UUIDs with the indexing performance of sequential IDs. However, if you're working with a monolithic application with simple needs, auto-increment remains a valid choice.
Ready to generate UUIDs?
Generate UUID